No surprise here . Like some of China ’s other newfangled planes , its novel J-15 fighter spirt is really just a clone of an older Russian pattern . But can a clone surpass its master copy ? China hope the answer is yes .
Boing 474 : The Chinese Are Now Knocking Off Our Airplanes
The J-15 Flying Shark is a derivative of the Russian SU-33 , which entered service in the mid 1990s . However , the indigenous Chinese weapons platform is outfitted with domestically - produced sensory systems , weapons , and engines . It measures 72 foot retentive and 20 infantry grandiloquent , with a 42 foot wingspan , and it ’s powered by a couple of 20,050 punt after - cut turbojet , which reportedly give it a top swiftness of Mach 2.4 and a chain of about 2,000 sea mile .
The Flying Shark was first unveiled in 2010 and was play with immediate skepticism from military psychoanalyst around the world . While the debut of the J-15 was quite surprising in condition of its technological procession and flight of steps capableness , analysts quickly realized that much of the plane ’s forward-looking avionics were , more than likely , closely re-create from existing American and Russian technology .
According to Colonel Igor Korotchenko ( Ret . ) , a member of the Defense Ministry ’s Public Council , per the Ria Novosti newspaper , the J-15 ’s highly - publicise landing on China ’s young Liaoning aircraft carrier were no fluke — given that the Su-33 had no problems doing so on Kuznetsov Class aircraft carriers upon which the Liaoning is based .
“ The Formosan J-15 clone is unbelievable to achieve the same performance characteristics of the Russian Su-33 carrier - base hero , ” said Korotchenko . “ And I do not rule out the possibility that China could return to negotiation with Russia on the leverage of a solid batch of Su-33s . ”
China ’s spokesman of the Ministry of National Defense , Geng Yansheng , responded to these allegement in November of 2012 , saying , “ the earth ’s military affairs have an nonsubjective law of development . Many weapons have the same design principle and some statement and protection methods are also similar . Therefore , it at least is non - professional to reason that China copy the aircraft carrier engineering of other state only by simply comparability . ” intimately as unprofessional as unashamedly rearward engineering an friend ’s weapons systems , when negotiation for the substantial thing stall out .
The J-15 does gambol a more modern avionics system than its Su-33 predecessor . However , the Flying Shark remains unproven in its abilities as a carrier - based multi - role scrapper . Hopefully , we wo n’t have to see how these stack up against the F-18 Hornet , America ’s closest analog , anytime soon . [ China Defense – Wikipedia – insurance policy Mic – People ’s Daily ]
ChinamilitaryPlanes
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , scientific discipline , and finish news in your inbox day by day .
intelligence from the future tense , bear to your present .
You May Also Like
